An engineer living in Canada, goes so far that it is the human responsibility for global warming is a “wonderful going to the truth.” On the other hand, environmentalists like Al Gore and Dr. David Suzuki says the opposite.
With these conflicting views, there is little research myself. They found that the belief in man-made global warming is far more faith in God – so much evidence, but not absolute proof, and we’re not sure until we are dead.
Skeptics argue that the human contribution is negligible pollution, nature produces far more greenhouse gases than human activity. He questions the science behind climate change, because different computer simulation models for different results. They point out that ice ages in the past, although there is no industrial activity.
The supporters of man-made global warming, on the other hand, show that the recent increase in carbon dioxide levels much higher than in the past few hundred years than ever before, and there is a dramatic temperature during this period. This is not just a coincidence.
Supporters also point out that the climate models can reproduce the observed temperature trends with reasonable accuracy only the effect of greenhouse gases included in the calculations. Different climate models with different results, but it is generally true for all the computer simulations. Supporters also point out that it is almost unanimous among the man-made global warming climatologists.
They found that global warming is changing the faith of the region. A world to believe, but many North American “think tank” of all human-caused global warning to reject. There are even “think tank”, which states that if global warming is the most cost-effective approach is not easy today, and deal with the future technology will be cost-effective operation. This is called an adaptive model of global warming. Further investigation shows that many of the “think tank” funded by big business including the oil companies’ interest in preserving the status quo.
For me, the “do-nothing” approach seems most appropriate. Ignoring the problem is usually not solved, and the delayed action is generally more expensive than at the beginning of the problem. The “do nothing” – Lens only helps large companies to delay the inevitable for a while. This is similar to that used by the disinformation campaign the tobacco industry a few decades ago.
Global warming is real? To find out, I followed the open-air conditions, the new service in New Delhi, India. The city is famous for its high air pollution.
When the machine has lost altitude during the descent, the outside temperature is about minus 60 ° C to plus 32 degrees C above 3000 feet above the airport. Then, surprisingly, the temperature is reduced again until it landed at the airport by an external temperature of 29 ° C.
Therefore, the maximum temperature is about 3000 meters above the ground, which is a temperature inversion layer. In fact, the greenhouse effect in a localized area, the air pollution. No matter what the deniers say is a clear and simple evidence that pollutants from human activity really causing global warming. And unless we make immediate steps to ensure that what is happening in some cities is polluted, the plan for the future of the planet.